The Silicon Underground
  Welcome to Dave Farquhar's Silicon Underground Friday, May 16 2008 @ 11:08 PM CDT  
Theme Changer
Change the look of the site by selecting a theme below:

What's New
STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
  • Better upgrade ad...

  • LINKS last 2 wks
    No recent new links

    Google Ads

    User Functions
    Username:

    Password:

    Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

    Firefox


    Salary cap? Baseball needs something   
    Wednesday, February 18 2004 @ 07:16 PM CST
    By David L. Farquhar

    Funny how now that the New York Yankees have added the most expensive sports contract in history, Alex Rodriguez, to their already outrageously priced roster, suddenly the freespending Boston Red Sox, owner of the second-most expensive sports contract in history and the second-highest payroll in baseball, are calling for a salary cap.

    The freespending teams of the 1980s quickly found that money doesn't buy championships. The Yankees outspent a lot of teams in the 1980s, and all it got them was some really awful teams. The Baltimore Orioles chased every big-name free agent it could in 1984 and landed a few. It never really got them anywhere--while they were one of the American League's proudest franchises in 1982, they haven't won a World Series since 1982.

    I still hated the Yankees for stealing Steve Farr and Danny Tartabull from my Royals, but I hated them more for what they did in the 1970s than for what they did after that. Farr and Tartabull didn't do all that much after they left the Royals for George Steinbrenner's money. Maybe they were finished anyway, maybe the pressure of New York got to them, or maybe they just weren't that good anyway. But the Yankees were more of a nuissance than anything else. They stole your players, then they still finished last. That's worse than the 1970s, when they'd occasionally steal a player, and always win the Series.

    The Yankees rose from the dead in the late 1990s and started winning World Series again. But the funny thing was, they did it largely on talent they found themselves. Sure, Paul O'Neill was an acquisition, but they traded for him, before he became a name. The same went for David Wells. John Wetteland was a free-agent signing, but they replaced him with Mariano Rivera, who was a home-grown talent. Bernie Williams, Derek Jeter, Jorge Posada, and Andy Pettite were players the Yankees developed.

    Later, the Yankees started adding players, but the core of the team didn't change much.

    But I think there's a difference. The Oakland A's developed a good, young, home-grown team using basically the same strategy the Yankees did: a combination of shrewd trades for underappreciated players and homegrown talent. But as the two teams' stars grew pricier, the Yankees were able to afford to keep them, and add additional stars (Roger Clemens, Jason Giambi, and Chuck Knoblauch, to name a few). The A's by and large had to let their free-agent stars go. When Jason Giambi signed with the Yanks, they replaced him with Scott Hatteburg--a former backup catcher for the Boston Red Sox whom management felt had never gotten a chance and was better than his numbers showed. Turns out they were right, but Hatteburg still isn't Jason Giambi.

    I still don't think money buys you championships, at least not from scratch. But I think it lets you keep them. The Cleveland Indians' rise started a little before the Yankees, but aside from an aging Omar Vizquel, there's nothing left from their late-'90s glory days. The Indians could finish last this year. Three years ago they were a lock to win their division. Like the A's, they couldn't afford to re-sign Albert Belle, Manny Ramirez, Jim Thome, Kenny Lofton, or Matt Williams, to name a few players who signed higher-priced contracts elsewhere.

    The Yankees' freespending ways could still backfire. Alex Rodriguez has never played in a large market. He has to adjust to playing in New York, and he has to adjust to playing third base. I don't know how well his ego can handle being pushed aside by Derek Jeter, who can be occasionally briliant (people remember Jeter for The Throw--if you saw it, you know what I'm talking about) but he doesn't have the range or the arm of either A-Rod or Boston's Nomar Garciaparra. He also doesn't have their bat. Frankly, Jeter's the second-best shortstop on the Yankees now, and at best, he's the fourth-best shortstop in the league and it won't be long before the Royals' Angel Berroa and Minnesota's Cristian Guzman eclipse him.

    Jason Giambi's injuries may keep him from playing first base, which will be a problem because the Yankees don't have a first-tier first baseman to replace him anymore. They traded Nick Johnson for pitching. Frankly, Giambi's facing the same kinds of injuries that did in Mark McGwire, but at a younger age. He may have to lose weight, which will hurt his home run totals, or he may have to retire. Either way, he's not helping the Yankees as much as they expected.

    Bernie Williams can't play center field anymore, which may pose a dilemma. For now, he's penciled in at DH, but he's not happy about it. He may wind up on first base so Giambi can DH. But Williams has always played center field. Moves from the outfield to first base often work, but not always. Both players are in their prime, salary-wise, but their best playing days are behind them. The same could be said for many of the Yankees of the 1980s and early 1990s.

    Part of me wants to think the problem is starting to correct itself. Greg Maddux is certainly one of the top three pitchers of his generation, and he never found a team to meet his salary demands. Finally, with spring training starting, he signed with the Chicago Cubs. Certainly the Cubs upped their offer, but Maddux waited much longer than he would have liked. While he was the last really big name to go unsigned, it would be hard to imagine a Greg Maddux waiting until February for a contract most other years. Few other players got pay raises this year; many of those who did had to sign with last-place clubs in order to get it. Some players actually took pay cuts, even after having good seasons.

    Maybe, it seems, after 30 years of spiraling salaries, teams have had enough. But then I read about Placido Polanco getting $4 million a year. Polanco's a good player, no doubt. But that's like paying $30,000 for a Honda Civic.

    I don't really have any answers that haven't been thought of already. Bob Costas wrote a great book several years ago with suggestions that would make baseball much more exciting by restoring competitive balance and make the game more accessible. His suggestions have been largely ignored.

    Meanwhile, we'll get to watch lean, mean teams beat up on the billionaire boys club that is the Yankees. Well, one can only hope.

      [ Views: 9867 ]  


    Salary cap? Baseball needs something | 8 comments | Create New Account
    The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
    Salary cap? Baseball needs something
    Authored by: Gatermann on Thursday, February 19 2004 @ 05:18 AM CST
    Did you see where the Cardinals and Albert Pujols have agreed on a 7 year 100 Million dollar contract? Makes him the fastest player in major leauge history to reach the 100 million mark.

    I like my Cardinals and all, but wow! Though in this day and age, I'm not sure what any teams choice are. They've done it to them selves by giving these enormous salleries. I just can't see it not biting them in the butt some day. Seems similiar to a company over expanding too quickly at times.

    Of course if the Cards hadn't signed him, the Yankees would have, and probalby turned him into a pitcher or catcher.

    [ Reply to This ]

    Salary cap? Baseball needs something
    Authored by: dean_c on Thursday, February 19 2004 @ 06:27 AM CST
    I'm a Red Sox fan (by birth) but I have to admit John Henry's comments regards a salary cap struck me pretty funny (as in sad). It is certainly true money won't guarantee a world series title. It is even more true regards buying a single high priced talent, regardless of ability. More often it is a detriment to team performance, and A-Rod in Texas is the best example, even though he fullfilled his end of the deal. The successful Yankee teams of the 90's were notable not only for a lot of home-grown talent but a lack of strong egos and attitude. I think a balanced roster of B+ level "professional" ballplayers that function well as a team competes well against any collection of A level talent divided by ego, for far less money (the 2002 Angels).

    On other notes, it will be interesting to see if Giambi or anyone else falls from the top tier as a result of the Steroid investigations now making headlines. If the sport truly gets cleaned up I will be glad. Pro athletes may not ask for the job of role model but it is thrust on them nonetheless. Like it or not, they (and the teams that pay them) have an obligation to be sensitive to the impact their conduct has on their young fans. It pains me but any one watching Garciapara at the end of last season and the during the playoffs has to wonder if he's still one of the elite short stops. Jeter, if he takes his role of Captain and team leader seriously, may yet admit he is the one who should move to 2nd or 3rd.

    Dave, I'm glad you're talking baseball again. April can't get here soon enough.

    ---
    Some things you must love because they're impossible to like

    [ Reply to This ]

    Correction
    Authored by: DaveF on Thursday, February 19 2004 @ 12:15 PM CST
    Baltimore won the World Series in 1983, not 1982. The winners in 1982 were the Cardinals. I know, I know, what kind of St. Louisan am I?

    The kind who roots for the Kansas City Royals, that's what kind. :)

    [ Reply to This ]

    Salary cap? Baseball needs something
    Authored by: JTrees on Thursday, February 19 2004 @ 06:47 PM CST
    In the past few years, I have truly become a diehard baseball fan. I've always like baseball, but only as I have gotten older have I learned about and appreciated the game's subtleties.

    I don't think baseball really needs a salary cap. Players (like "Pay-Rod") choose to play for the Yankees for more than just money (although that's the #1 reason); they do it because of the Yankees historical legacy and "mystique", if you want to call it that. Also, it's about being in the bright lights, big city, big media market thing, although that can certainly backfire. As for New York, A-Rod won't have any trouble adjusting to the big city; in fact, I think he'll thrive on it, that's just his personality.

    Don't think that I'm an A-Rod fan, however. I'm a Seattle Mariners fan, and we don't take kindly to him choosing the Texas Rangers and his outrageous contract with them over playing for a contender. Trust me, next time he shows up at Safeco Field in a Yankees uniform, he'll be booed, and booed LOUDLY. His first return to Seattle in a Rangers uniform resulted in Monopoly money and (real) coins being tossed onto the field. We hate the Yanks, and we hate A-Rod.

    I'm looking forward to April as well, as the Mariners have made some good changes in the off-season, adding Scott Spiezio at third base to replace the ineffective Jeff Cirillo, and Rich Aurilia at shortstop. Losing Kazuhiro Sasaki was unfortunate, but Eddie Guardado should fill in nicely (I know, "stolen" from the Twins). I still think that the Mariners need a solid power hitter if we really want to be contenders, but mostly this year is about keeping what we already have (Edgar Martinez, Boone, Olerud) and adjusting to our Mike Cameron-less outfield. Anyway, sorry for the rambling, bring on MLB 2004!

    [ Reply to This ]

    Salary cap? Baseball needs something
    Authored by: joseph on Thursday, February 19 2004 @ 09:36 PM CST
    As long as the fans will pay the cost, why deprive the players of their salaries? It does drive the ticket prices up but that keeps out the riff raff.
    If you have to cap something, cap Teacher's salaries. They are always hollering about bread and circuses and how nations fall.

    [ Reply to This ]

    What's Related
  • More by DaveF
  • More from Baseball

  • Story Options
  • Mail Story to a Friend
  • Printable Story Format


  • Calendar
    May 2008
    SuMoTuWeThFrSa
    27
    28
    29
    30
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28
    29
    30
    31
    Click on any day to see postings and events for that date.

    Referrals

    Top 10 by Comments
    Story TitleComments
    Cheap laptops from Sotec 253
    An untrustworthy vendor 164
    Upgrading an eMachine 125
    eMachine upgrade advice 99
    Why I dislike Microsoft 51
    Upgrade diary: Gateway G6-400 35
    And we're live 30
    The day after the Columbia 22
    How to pray 22
    CD-ROM troubleshooting under Windows 9x 20

    Top 10 Read
    Story TitleViews
    eMachine upgrade advice 63751
    Upgrading an eMachine 54551
    How to view a blg file in Windows 2000 33633
    Cheap laptops from Sotec 27933
    Upgrade diary: Compaq Presario 7360 16914
    Upgrade diary: Gateway G6-400 15734
    CD-ROM troubleshooting under Windows 9x 13004
    Finding an open-source alternative to Ghost 10864
    Big trouble 10164
    Salary cap? Baseball needs something 9868

    Topics
    Home
    Apache (2)
    Baseball (59)
    Book reviews (2)
    Business (1)
    Christianity (56)
    Cooking (1)
    Copyright (15)
    Curmudgeonry (1)
    Design (7)
    DOS (6)
    Games (4)
    Genealogy (10)
    General (492)
    Hardware (140)
    Health (12)
    Human Interest (9)
    Humor/Satire (19)
    Journalism (1)
    Linux (92)
    Macintosh (22)
    Model Building (2)
    Music (32)
    net.culture (39)
    Personal (76)
    Photography (6)
    Retro Computing (24)
    Saving money (48)
    Servers and Networking (17)
    Society (44)
    Software (45)
    Spam (13)
    St. Louis (22)
    This weblog (14)
    Toy trains (72)
    Troubleshooting (7)
    Vendors (6)
    Video (20)
    Viruses (12)
    Windows (114)
    Writing (16)

    Older Stories
    Friday 21-Mar
  • Flooding (0)

  • Sunday 16-Mar
  • An insider's view of the Atari ST (0)

  • Saturday 15-Mar
  • Don't fall for get-rich-quick schemes: Check out the claims before you sign (0)

  • Friday 07-Mar
  • Make something! Fix something! (0)

  • Wednesday 27-Feb
  • The sad story of Scott Spiezio (0)

  • Tuesday 26-Feb
  • What net neutrality means and why it's a good thing (0)

  • Sunday 24-Feb
  • Getting domesticated (or at least more handy) (0)

  • Thursday 21-Feb
  • Misplaced faith (0)

  • Friday 15-Feb
  • This changes everything (6)

  • Tuesday 12-Feb
  • The argument for paying your mortgage off early (1)

  • Who's Online
    Guest Users: 7

    Syndicate!
    Get your RSS/RDF fix here.

    List of all stories
    Click here for a list of all the entries on this site


    Created this page in 0.94 seconds


     Copyright © 2008 Dave Farquhar's Silicon Underground
     All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.

    Powered by GL 1.3.x