Crime’s downward spiral

I used to waffle on the death penalty. But if the kidnapping, rape, and apparent planned murder of Tamara Brooks and Jacqueline Marris this week doesn’t illustrate why the death penalty is sometimes necessary, I don’t know what will.
More details of Roy Ratliff’s sorry excuse for a life will undoubtedly surface in the days and weeks to come. He committed his first crime before his final two victims were even born. He jumped parole last year, was accused of raping his stepdaugher, then went on one final spree, stealing cars at gunpoint, threatening the drivers with death, and finally, kidnapping and raping two teenaged girls young enough to be his daughters. The girls’ rescuers were convinced he was looking for a place to kill and bury them when they shot him dead.

I’ll be perfectly honest: I’m glad the two deputies shot Ratliff dead. It saved a messy trial, saved the girls undue pain (they’ve been through enough), and it eliminated the chances he’d get off on a technicality, or that he’d play the same game that Leonard Smith played. Smith killed baseball star Lyman Bostock with a shotgun blast in Gary, Indiana in 1978. He pleaded insanity. Twenty-one months after Lyman Bostock died, Smith was a free man again, on grounds that he was no longer insane.

Crime is addictive. I saw it as a teenager. I knew people who started off with little crimes. It started off with pirating cheap computer games. Then they started stealing long distance so they could pirate more cheap computer games. Before long they were stealing credit cards to get more computer equipment. I know of one person who got caught in this mess and started selling drugs so he could pay for all the long distance calls he’d made illegally.

Not everyone gets to that stage. I pirated some computer games as a teenager. As a matter of fact, I don’t know anyone who had a computer when I was a teenager who didn’t pirate software. But for some, the allure of getting away with something was just too much. I never got far beyond casual copying. I figured out how to crack a manual keyword-based protection scheme with a sector editor (I just changed all the words to the same word, then changed the screen to tell you to type that word), but I just passed copies of the game to a few friends. I wasn’t willing to upload seven disks’ worth of stuff at 1200 bps. I had better things to do. I found ways to justify pirating software to myself–for a time–but stealing long distance or stealing credit cards was wrong.

But not everyone thought so.

I’m not saying all those guys I know about are destined to become serial kidnappers or worse. But a tangle of crimes can easily become just like a tangle of lies. You get caught, and you have to commit a bigger crime to get yourself out of the mess the last one got you into. Just like Bill Clinton and his lies.

And that seems to be what happened to Ratliff. You can certainly see the pattern of behavior. He stole a car. The car developed a flat tire. So he stole a truck and attempted to torch the car he’d stolen before, to cover up the evidence. And that seems to be what he planned to do with the two girls he kidnapped–once he’d gotten what he wanted from them, keep them from testifying by putting them in the ground.

Maybe I’m wrong to assert that Ratliff was beyond help, beyond rehabilitation. But when it comes to serial rapists, I’m not interested in finding out. When someone rapes more than one woman or murders a child, I think the best thing to do is send him to God and let Him figure out what to do with him. Maybe God will show him what it’s like to be intimidated and destroyed by someone who makes him look powerless by comparison. Maybe He won’t. At that point it’s His business.

We’ll never know what drove Ratliff to his final deeds. Maybe he thought he could get away with this just like he’d gotten away with previous crimes. Maybe he just needed a bigger sick thrill. Maybe he sensed his end was near, and he was going on one final binge of his addiction before going down in a blaze of glory. That phenomenon was well documented in World War I airmen, whose life expectancy on the front was literally measured in weeks. They drank and slept around like there was no tomorrow, because in many cases there wasn’t.

There’s no sure-fire way to predict which guys who traffic in speed will ultimately end up harmless and which ones will end up like Ratliff. Knowing more about their history, you can profile them, but no one can predict the future.

And you can’t tell a crook just by looking at him. Yeah, Ratliff looked like an unsavory character. But so did one of the interviewees in the first video project I ever participated in. But Joe cleaned up. And now Joe dedicates an awful lot of his spare time helping other people clean up.

I don’t know if the recent rash of kidnappings is really a change in reality or just a change in the way news is reported. Face it, kidnapping is a big story right now. Murder was a big story a century ago, and many newspapers operated under the mantra, “if it bleeds, it leads.” This might just be the 21st century’s answer to that.

I’m not a big fan of teaching your kids not to talk to strangers. I was taught that, and I never got over it. I still have the hardest time talking to people I don’t know. But considering the alternative, it’s an easy choice. Tell your kids not to talk to strangers. Prevention’s a whole lot less painful than rehabilitation.

And while you can’t spot the dangerous criminals of today by looking at them, you stand a chance of being able to predict the dangerous criminals of tomorrow. Kids who steal at a very early age without any remorse and who torture and kill small animals are at very high risk for developing far worse antisocial tendencies when they get older. But when a kid’s age is still measured in single digits, there’s still hope for them. Exert some positive peer pressure on the parent(s) to get the kid straightened out.

You owe it to your grandchildren.

11 thoughts on “Crime’s downward spiral

  • August 2, 2002 at 12:15 am
    Permalink

    Very well done.

    Thank you.

  • August 2, 2002 at 1:45 am
    Permalink

    What Dan said.

  • August 2, 2002 at 9:34 am
    Permalink

    I saw some interesting poll results yesterday. Around 70% of Americans are in favor of a mandatory death penalty for those who murder children. I understand why even those who oppose the death penalty would count themselves in the majority here. Killing is heinous enough, but killing a child who can’t defend themselves is an abomination. These scum deserve swift justice, a la Tom Jefferson: hang ’em the morning after conviction. Yep, a Founding Father weighs in on capital punishment…

    As for the insanity plea: I think this has always been a crock. A person once pointed out to me that you have to be insane to kill someone. In those murderous moments, you cannot be in your right mind; I see nothing to contradict that.

    I believe in personal responsibility. I don’t believe that it’s society’s responsibility to spend $30K per year providing food and shelter for those who don’t value the lives of others. Granted, I guess it’s not the greatest arrangement. No R or X-rated movies.

  • August 2, 2002 at 3:31 pm
    Permalink

    A rash of kidnappings? I don’t think so. Grown women are abducted every day. Ratliff and his crime are remarkable only due to the ambition he showed in abducting not one, but two, girls and the happy fact that he was gunned down before killing them.

    To a man like Ratliff, other people were just things to be consumed. He’s a good example of what was commonly called the “criminal mentality,” a term that has fallen out of favor in recent years. And he’s not rare, either.

    I wonder if the death penalty, administered swiftly, would deter people like Ratliff from committing the final brutality in murdering the witnesses. A death sentence now is actually a 13-to-18 year prison sentence punctuated by unlimited appeals. Perhaps that’s more fair, but it’s hardly a deterrent.

    I’m not surprised most Americans support capital punishment for murdering a child. It seems like something most of us can agree on. I hope that advancements in DNA science will restore public faith in the criminal justice system.

  • August 2, 2002 at 4:21 pm
    Permalink

    I’ve said this before – a lot – perhaps even on this forum. I’m actually quoting or paraphrasing Robert Heinlein.

    Some criminals need to be removed as a public health measure. By all means be fair, be just, give them a fair trial if the opportunity arises. Don’t be vindiictive – don’t let them pull you down to their level. But at the end of the process, make 100% sure that they can never under any circumstances repeat their crime. Remove that possibility in the one guaranteed way – along with the criminal.

  • August 2, 2002 at 5:48 pm
    Permalink

    Perhaps with sufficient improvement in organ transplants, Larry Niven’s “organ bank problem” can be a reality — swift justice and useful to human society!

    Mike

  • August 2, 2002 at 10:37 pm
    Permalink

    Dave,
    MR JUSTICE WHITE, joined by MR JUSTICE STEWART, MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, and MR. JUSTICE STEVENS, concluded that the sentence of death for the crime of rape is grossly disproportionate and excessive punishment, and is therefore forbidden by the Eighth Amendment as cruel and unusual punishment. http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/death_penalty.html
    They made a terrible decision and women and children are paying the price.

  • August 3, 2002 at 4:03 am
    Permalink

    Disagree – while I agree that there are cases where the death penalty is perfectly appropriate given the existance of a death penalty there will inevitably be cases in which the death penalty is applied wrongly. Although it is a given that evil must come into the world, there is also authority for woe to he by who it comes. I will forego the rightous death penalty cases to avoid the blood of innocents on my hands.

  • October 13, 2003 at 2:57 pm
    Permalink

    comment Sicko’s like that should be killed the day after there proven guilty.There are no excuses for a crime against a child or rape. These sicko’s are worthless pieces of crap, they pick on the weak & innocent to get there jollies. My opinion is they are damaged goods, disfunctional sicko’s who I have not one bit of pity for.

  • October 13, 2003 at 2:57 pm
    Permalink

    comment Sicko’s like that should be killed the day after there proven guilty.There are no excuses for a crime against a child or rape. These sicko’s are worthless pieces of crap, they pick on the weak & innocent to get there jollies. My opinion is they are damaged goods, disfunctional sicko’s who I have not one bit of pity for.

  • October 15, 2003 at 1:50 am
    Permalink

    Great article, sore subject. I don’t think we’ll every come to a %100 agreement on the death penalty, as there are many who feel that there is a chance that they’ll sentence the wrong person.

    I personally believe it should be used in severe cases where it is ruled that the criminal simply cannot be rehabilitated.

    Ratliff was a threat to society, and he needed to have been taken out. I also feel no remorse, as anyone with enough money can buy their way out of a trial.

    I recently read, “The Immortal” by Angela Elwell Hunt
    ISBN 0-8499-1630-5 (Great book BTW), and was shocked to hear of how the legal system is played like a game of cards.

    They mention having the jurors screened and analyzed to provide a rigged verdict for guilty clients.

    The sad fact is, that stuff happens. More often than not it would seem, the guilty get away to do it again.

    It’s the great political money machine that rolls out them back out into society, where they can play their games again.

    I for one and sick of it.

    Read these articles to get an idea how screwed up the Legal System is (USA)

    http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/3563/25540
    http://www.newschannel8.net/news/stories/0803/97826.html

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this:
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux