On March 8, 1983, IBM released the follow up to its very successful IBM PC. The new model was called the PC/XT and it carried the model number 5160. “XT” stood for “eXtended Technology.” It offered greater expandability than the original PC, but improvements in speed and memory capacity had to wait for the next model, the 5170 PC/AT.
Overview of the IBM PC/XT

At launch time, the PC/XT retailed for $4,995 with 128KB of RAM, a single 360K floppy, and a 10 MB hard drive. A CGA video card cost $244 and the monitor cost $680. So this was not a budget system in 1983 by any stretch. If you wanted to live high on the hog and spring for the full 640K of RAM, that cost $700 additional.
Outwardly, the PC and XT look a lot alike. To tell the difference, you have to look at the badge, or look at the back and see how many expansion slots it has. An XT typically came with a single 5.25-inch floppy drive in the left bay and a hard drive in the right bay, but some people put hard drives in the right bay of a PC, or a second floppy in the right bay of an XT while replacing the hard drive with something internal. So you can’t just tell by looking at the drive bays.
Architecturally, other than losing the cassette port next to the keyboard port, the 5160 is essentially unchanged from the 5150. It still uses a 4.77 MHz Intel 8088 CPU with a 640K conventional memory limit and an 8-bit data bus and runs PC DOS. The motherboard has room for either 256K or 640K of RAM on the board, and it’s possible to modify the 256K board to take 640K.
Modifying a 256K IBM PC/XT motherboard for 640K
If you have a 256K board and want to put 640K on it, you can do so with an inexpensive, easy, and easily reversible modification.
Install a 74LS158 chip into the empty socket labeled U84. Bridge the jumper pad labeled E2 or install header pins and a jumper. It’s easiest to just solder a small wire between the two pads, and removing the wire to revert the mod is simple. E2 is near the power connector.
Then remove the 18 memory chips in banks 0 and 1, and replace them with (18) 41256 memory chips. Finally, be sure that switches 3 and 4 of switch block SW1 are set to the OFF position.
The power supply
The PC came with a 63 watt power supply, which was adequate for up to two floppy drives, but not enough to reliably power most hard drives available in the early 1980s. The conventional wisdom was that if you wanted a hard drive in a PC, you needed to replace the power supply.
The PC/XT came with a 130-watt power supply, which is wimpy by today’s standards, but was large for 1983. The XT’s 130 watts is enough to power an early 1980s hard drive and the rest of the system.
Today this is all less of a concern since XT-IDE is an option, and an XT-IDE adapter plus a compact flash card uses far less power than a 1980s hard drive did.
Expansion slots
IBM also gave the XT eight expansion slots, rather than the mere five the original PC gave you. This was important, since neither the PC nor XT had much built into its motherboard. Putting everything in expansion slots made the machine very upgradeable, but five expansion slots quickly proved not to be enough.
Why not? You needed one slot for your video card and another one for your disk controller card. Initially, both the serial and parallel port usually came on their own cards. Once you added a memory expansion card, your machine was full.
Multifunction cards, which combined the serial and parallel ports and memory expansion onto a single card, opened up a couple of slots. But if you added a hard drive, its controller chewed up one of your slots. So you were full again, or close to it.
With 8 slots in the PC/XT, it was possible to use all original IBM parts including the single-function cards, and still have room to add an Ad Lib sound card and network card. There’s an Intel card that’s easy to get working and the 3Com 3C509 can also be made to work. Not all cards work in the 8th slot in a 5160, so you have to be careful about using that slot. IBM only intended for slot 8 to be used with the IBM Asynchronous Serial Card. So if you’re using an original IBM serial card, put that card in slot 8, closest to the CPU, to avoid compatibility problems.
With the use of multifunction cards, the XT has more expandability than most people need. Not that that’s really a bad thing.
Hard drive
The XT typically came with a hard drive, either 10 or 20 megabytes depending on when you bought it. IBM’s OEMs for the PC/XT were Seagate and Miniscribe. When the XT didn’t initially meet IBM’s sales expectations, the cancelled drive orders hurt Miniscribe’s bottom line. It didn’t initially seem to matter, but off the books, Miniscribe was reeling and went into a tailspin.
Rarity
The 5160 PC/XT isn’t rare. But it sold 2.1 million units compared to 3.3 million PC 5150s. My educated guess is that about 600,000 more Revision B 5150s were produced than 5160s. And yet, I often saw 5150s–any 5150–sell for more than a 5160.
That seems to have stopped after I started saying in blog posts that the 5160 is the less common of the two. But I still wondered several things. How common are those three models relative to each other? And is it possible that more 5160s survived than 5160s? I could see why that would be possible.
So I tested the theory. It took me about 3 evenings to collect and analyze enough data to conclude that yes, the revision B 5150 is more common than the 5160, and both are considerably more common than the revision A 5150. I only have enough data to be 80 percent confident of the proportions, with a 10 percent margin of error. But all the differences I observed are well outside the margin of error. I will continue to collect data, but I estimate it will be 2027 before I have enough data for 95 percent certainty and a margin of error of 5 percent.
I used the same common statistical methods that insurance companies use to set prices and political consultants use to win elections. Some 30 years after I took that class in college, I’m finally using it.
The 5160 is actually the better machine and I think it’s the better bargain. It has more expansion slots and a bigger power supply, so you can expand it further than you can expand any 5150, especially when using period-correct parts.
Clones
This kind of goes without saying, but the PC/XT was very widely cloned. Some XT clones look very much like a true blue PC/XT, with a similarly sized case and 8 slots. Somewhat later clones maintained the same size but changed the styling to look a little more like an AT. A steady supply of off-the-shelf parts manufactured overseas made small scale manufacturing of XT-class machines very easy and inexpensive. That was how Dell got started. There were dozens of companies in every major city doing similar things.
I get flooded with questions about random obscure manufacturers of XT clones. Unless they were in St. Louis, where I lived at the time, I don’t know anything about them. Even if they were in St. Louis, I probably don’t know much about them. Because they were clones built from commonly available interchangeable parts, there’s almost nothing to distinguish them.
Later brand-name XT clones took advantage of miniaturization to move the essentials onto the motherboard and shrink the machine’s size by about 1/3 while providing the same capability.
From a usability perspective, clones can be more desirable because they ran at faster speeds like 7.16 MHz or 9.54 MHz.
IBM discontinued the PC/XT in April 1987, but XT clones remained on the market beyond that date. For someone wanting to run DOS apps in the late 1980s, an XT clone provided a very affordable way to do so since many office supply stores sold them for less than $700, often bundled with a monochrome monitor and dot matrix printer. When the public lost interest in XT-class systems it lost interest very rapidly, but it was the release of Microsoft Windows 3.0 in 1990 that was the tipping point.

David Farquhar is a computer security professional, entrepreneur, and author. He has written professionally about computers since 1991, so he was writing about retro computers when they were still new. He has been working in IT professionally since 1994 and has specialized in vulnerability management since 2013. He holds Security+ and CISSP certifications. Today he blogs five times a week, mostly about retro computers and retro gaming covering the time period from 1975 to 2000.

what about IBM PC/XT clones ?
my cousin had a 8mhz 8088 XT clones
iirc pc limited and samsung sold xt clones
I have written a few blog posts about various clones, usually if there was something interesting or unusual about them. I have a blog post about Dell that covers PC’s Limited and another about Leading Edge. And my blog post about 80s computer brands mentions a lot of clone makers. But when it comes to any specific manufacturer or model, I probably can’t cover all of them in my lifetime. Someone probably could create a blog just about XT clones, and if someone did, I would probably read it. I don’t have anything against XT clones but I don’t want to be that hyper-specialized.
how does a clone 8mhz 8088 xt with EGA card and monitor and ad lib pc sound from pc limited and samsung compare with Tandy 1000 for 80s dos gaming ?
my mom refused mail order though so Radio Shack
The thing about Tandy graphics and sound was that it didn’t overwhelm an 8088 CPU. EGA and Ad Lib worked on an 8088 but you really wanted at least a 286 for that. EGA and Ad Lib looked and sounded better but if your game was dragging, it detracted from it. That’s why I keep a Tandy 1000 set up next to my 286. Mid 80s titles shine on the Tandy. Late 80s titles are nicer on my 286 or my 386.
most 80s dos game used Tandy graphics and sound iirc
did you ever used a make it 286 to 486 cpu upgrade for Tandy tl or tx?
my cousin bought xt clone with 640k cga 20 meg hd 51/4 monitor for $2700 in 86
With these things having 128k at launch, I would no longer belittle my college for having XTs or ATs with 640k when I was in college in the early 90s.
Is that PC XT the right picture? It has a 101 key keyboard that came with the AT.