I’m working right now for a Fortune 25 company. This story is going to sound like bragging, so I’ll ask forgiveness in advance. Maybe if I mention I’m a contractor, then it’s not bragging quite so bad.
Well, said Fortune 25 company has a large number of servers lots of versions of Unix, including AIX, which is IBM’s version of Unix. Years ago, said company contracted with EDS, which was the company that made Ross Perot a billionaire, to maintain them. Supporting lots of stuff from lots of different vendors was EDS’ business.
Fast forward to 2008, and HP bought EDS to complement the consulting business it bought Compaq to get. So my client ended up paying HP to host and support a large number of IBM servers running IBM’s version of Unix, and a much smaller number of HP servers running HP/UX.
I needed a change made on the AIX servers this past Friday. It was a minor change, but it didn’t work. The sysadmin that HP assigned to the case couldn’t figure it out either, and ended up opening a support case with IBM.
I chuckled at the irony of seeing an IBM support ticket from HP in my inbox, though I’m sure this (and the opposite) happen all the time without us knowing. IBM quickly figured out what HP needed to do, and closed the ticket.
I briefed my management team on it Monday morning. “IBM helped HP, and now I’m seeing what I’m supposed to see.”
Then I paused.
“So it only took three Fortune 25 companies to figure this one out.”
So, this week, if I come up with something that takes four Fortune 25 companies to fix, is that better or worse?