A kids’ game

The Philadelphia Phillies have one of the brightest futures in the National League. Sure, the Mets and the Braves grab all the attention. But look at them. They’re old. The Mets have Mo Vaughn and Roberto Alomar and Mike Piazza, and all of them are probably still in their prime, but they only have a couple more years of prime left. The Braves have Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux and Gary Sheffield, but that’s indicative of the same problem.
The Phillies are loaded with young stars. The Phillies once had a better third baseman than Scott Rolen. His name was Mike Schmidt. I can only think of two third basemen in the history of the game who deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as Schmidt. In about 15 years, Rolen looks to join them. And the Phillies have a great young catcher in Mike Lieberthal and a great young outfield in Doug Glanville and and Pat Burrell and Bobby Abreu. They also have one of the best young shortstops in the game in Jimmy Rollins.

The Phillies’ payroll is going to be $60 million this year. And Rolen, surrounded by these young stars, questions the Phillies’ ability or commitment to win. At the end of the year, he’s out of there.

The Phillies’ strategy should be really simple. Let these young stars get a little better, sign them to the longest-term contracts they’ll take, and play as hard as possible for two years, knowing they’ll probably finish in third place with a winning record, all the while waiting for the Mets and Braves to fall over. If everything were to stay the same, in three years the Phillies would no longer be the third-best team in their division. They’d cruise right past the gray-headed Mets and Braves.

But nobody really knows what the Phillies are going to do. In the past, when they’ve developed minor stars, they’ve frequently traded them. The last time they won anything was 1993, but that was an old team. It’s hard to look to that team for a precedent to suggest what they’ll do now, because keeping their aging stars in the mid-1990s didn’t make much sense. It’s hard to look at the way the Phillies handled players like Mickey Morandini as well. Morandini was a minor star who faded fast. Rolen and Lieberthal are superstars. Future Hall of Famers even, maybe.

In any other sport, there wouldn’t be any question what to do. They’d lock in their six young stars and tell their fans to get ready to enjoy a dynasty. But baseball isn’t any other sport. There’s very little revenue sharing. And Philadelphia’s not a major market. The Yankees are going to spend twice as much as the Phillies spend this year. It’s hard to imagine Philadelphia not being a major market, I know, but that’s how things have become in this sport.

Twenty years ago, players used to express amazement at signing six-figure salaries to play a kids’ game. Today, baseball’s still a kids’ game. And the players have the maturity of children. So do the owners and the commissioner.

There’s a solution to this madness. Bob Costas wrote a short book about it two years ago. It’s short and simple enough that even a moron like Bud Selig could understand it. Today, things have only gotten worse. Fans read Costas’ book in droves and took it to heart, but few of the owners seem to have done so.

If Selig gets his way, the Twins and the Expos will fold at the end of this season. That won’t do anything to stop the same teams from making the postseason again and again. It’ll be the Braves, Mets, Diamondbacks and Cardinals in the NL postseason again this year. And probably the year after.

The Phillies will find that without a salary cap to keep salaries from artificially rising and without revenue sharing to give them their fair share (The Mets have to have someone to play, so why doesn’t the visiting team get half the revenue?) they won’t be able to afford to keep their players. Scott Rolen will test the free-agent waters at the end of this season. I expect he’ll sign with the Braves or the Red Sox. If he signs with the Braves, the Phillies will almost certainly dismantle, because there’s little difference between finishing third and finishing fifth, and it’s a lot cheaper to finish fifth.

And people will wonder what if. Except for Bud Selig and his buddy Carl Pohlad, who got what they wanted. They can just keep counting their money and complaining about how unprofitable baseball is.

4 thoughts on “A kids’ game

  • February 21, 2002 at 11:18 am
    Permalink

    Dave, I know what a great fan of baseball you are, plus you are extremely knowledgeable of the sport, but there’s one major thing to be told of baseball. It’s entertainment. The same thing can be said of any major (or minor) sports field. Sure the fans probably care if their favorite teams wins, but if they are going to pay the bucks to see them live, they want to see action. Usually the satisfaction comes from the superstars, although it’s great to see young players shine through.

    Regarding profitablility, yeah it would be nice, but if they truly loved the game as the reason they got into the business, they should be happy to break even after salaries to all players (staff and owners). Let them make extra money on merchandise. Of course the theory goes that merchandise sells for winning teams. However I still see a lot of Cubs hats even in this town of St. Louis. 🙂

  • February 21, 2002 at 5:20 pm
    Permalink

    I absolutely LOVE sports. And the only real way to see it is live. And to do so, I have to be willing to fork over the money, and lot’s of it. Which I do from time to time. But it still amazes me that these men get paid astronomical saleries TO PLAY A GAME! Luck has everything to do with the fact that they were able to pursue such a career. Talent keeps them in the game. Am I jealous? Heck yeah! It would be fabulous to get the amount of money these players do. And I know I work a whole lot harder at my job. But I love my job, so that’s why I do it. However, more power to these players who make all this money because saps like myself are willing to throw away money for crappy seats to watch them, thus paying their saleries.

  • February 18, 2003 at 8:47 pm
    Permalink

    Call me crazy but I’m guessing this is the year for the underdogs. It will be the Phillies and the Blue Jays that surprise everyone this year.

  • February 18, 2003 at 8:49 pm
    Permalink

    I think the Phillies coul be big too.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this:
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux