Comments on: Umm, no, that’s not Commodore, and that’s not an Amiga https://dfarq.homeip.net/umm-no-thats-not-commodore-and-thats-not-an-amiga/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=umm-no-thats-not-commodore-and-thats-not-an-amiga David L. Farquhar on technology old and new, computer security, and more Mon, 26 Mar 2012 02:44:46 +0000 hourly 1 By: PerryM https://dfarq.homeip.net/umm-no-thats-not-commodore-and-thats-not-an-amiga/#comment-11745 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 02:44:46 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=5204#comment-11745 Long time reader, long time since I commented…

I agree with you completely. Somebody is trying to cash in on the name, but they are definitely NOT providing a product that the old Commodore would have stood for. Way too expensive, and not even close to what I hoping for when I heard they were “reviving” the Amiga and C-64.

]]>