Comments on: Timex Sinclair 1000 computer: Revisiting its legacy https://dfarq.homeip.net/timex-sinclair-1000/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=timex-sinclair-1000 David L. Farquhar on technology old and new, computer security, and more Fri, 26 Dec 2025 22:10:19 +0000 hourly 1 By: Dave Farquhar https://dfarq.homeip.net/timex-sinclair-1000/#comment-56952 Wed, 23 Apr 2025 03:06:52 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=24001#comment-56952 In reply to Gideon.

Yes, the Timex vs Atari was not a fair fight at all. The Atari 8-bits were amazing machines.

I do wish I’d picked up a TS1000 at some point and maybe I eventually will. It seems like a fun thing to have around, even though I know I’ll rarely use it.

]]>
By: Gideon https://dfarq.homeip.net/timex-sinclair-1000/#comment-56948 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:51:41 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=24001#comment-56948 I saw one Timex in the wild, probably in the mid-80s, and I remember being distinctly unimpressed. I’d had an Atari -bit since 1983, and the Sinclair was comparatively a joke. That’s neat about it being a Ver. 0 Raspberry Pi, though!

]]>
By: neo https://dfarq.homeip.net/timex-sinclair-1000/#comment-56945 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 01:37:10 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=24001#comment-56945 coco3 vs c64 who’s wins children love

]]>
By: Mark R https://dfarq.homeip.net/timex-sinclair-1000/#comment-56944 Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:46:36 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=24001#comment-56944 In reply to Mark R.

Adding to my own post, as I hit ‘post’ too quickly.

At the time, I never heard anything about Timex’s computer aspirations or the team leading their erstwhile, short-lived computer efforts – and I’ve never heard anything about it in all the retro history-digging that’s happened since. I mean, in a world where you can learn the pizza preferences of anyone named Tramiel and which model of private jet Irving Gould flew back and forth to the Bahamas, it’s maybe a little odd there’s zero info (to my knowledge) on the people or plan behind Timex’s corporate adventure into computers.

I suspect that may be because, there was no plan and (almost) no people behind it. I think it was an attempt to get in on a “hot” new consumer category by slapping a *vaguely* related but still well-known, old consumer brand on a computer and pushing it through Timex’s distribution channels. In retrospect, what we saw in the market is consistent with that theory. There were a handful of national launch ads, a few follow-up ads in computer trades and mostly co-op marketing funded retailer ads. Co-op marketing is where the manufacturer gives the retailer a partial rebate on their order in exchange for the retailer featuring the product in their ads and/or in-store end caps. This would have been the standard distribution ‘push-through’ playbook back then for the sales force of a mass market brand like Timex. And when the product sell-in didn’t sell-through very well, Timex dropped it like the fleeting cash grab it was.

If other info exists countering this hypothesis, I’d actually be *delighted* to be proven wrong. It would be somehow reassuring to discover there was a small team of product people at Timex who passionately believed in consumer computing and had a plan to sweep the market (no matter how misguided that plan may have been).

]]>
By: Mark R https://dfarq.homeip.net/timex-sinclair-1000/#comment-56943 Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:21:52 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=24001#comment-56943 The TS1000 was such a strange little machine. I never used one back in the day but I clearly remember that, for a short time, there was an end cap stack of them on sale for $99 at the local Von’s supermarket (a regional chain) where my family shopped. To be clear, this was not a combo general goods & food store like some current WalMart’s and Target stores. This store sold nothing but groceries and it wasn’t especially large or well-stocked. That was so odd that it struck even teenaged, pre-grizzled computer industry veteran, me as super weird.

Of course today I have a pristine example of every model of UK Sinclair and US Timex Sinclair in my collection, but even back then, the early Sinclairs never caught my interest. As you said, they just didn’t compare well to against any of the $200-$400 competition – and that keyboard… Although the later Sinclairs did get pretty interesting, even before the 68K-based QL. The Spectrum line was decent but they were, unfortunately, only commonly available in the UK so they remained only something interesting to read about in imported magazines at the time.

]]>
By: garyohuk https://dfarq.homeip.net/timex-sinclair-1000/#comment-56516 Tue, 09 Jul 2024 07:10:55 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=24001#comment-56516 Hi Dave, if you DM me your email id I have a video I can share you might find interesting.

]]>
By: garyohuk https://dfarq.homeip.net/timex-sinclair-1000/#comment-56515 Tue, 09 Jul 2024 07:01:27 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=24001#comment-56515 Sinclair had a reputation for developing really innovative products but which weren’t built well, or which had an irritating flaw (here black and white graphics).
I had used a Commodore PET at work and knew the Sinclair machines were poor in comparison. I eventually bought a Vic 20 for myself and instantly regretted it as it was so underpowered, then they bought out the C64 and I felt this even more being stuck with my Vic 20.
The Sinclairs caught that early wave of computing enthusiasm, but were replaced in popular use by the BBC Micro, which you have mentioned in the past. The BBC Micro was part of a computer education project on BBC TV and was really successful. It was developed by Acorn, which now lives on as ARM the developers of the ubiquitous processor corer used in most mobile phones today.

]]>