Comments on: The pundits are wrong about Apple’s defection https://dfarq.homeip.net/the-pundits-are-wrong-about-apples-defection-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-pundits-are-wrong-about-apples-defection-2 David L. Farquhar on technology old and new, computer security, and more Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:28:21 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/the-pundits-are-wrong-about-apples-defection-2/#comment-1794 Fri, 09 Aug 2002 18:46:02 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=1078#comment-1794 I’ll warn readers in advance that I’m getting on a tangent here. 🙂

Dave T, I don’t think the trend towards tabloid IT journalism is anything new. Hell, Computerrag, er, Computerworld has been doing it for years. They publish these groundbreaking stories on how NCs will make the PC obsolete, even before Larry Ellison stuck his foot in his mouth. Most of the studies they quoted (when I had my free subscription) were profound – and put out by the consulting group that runs the paper. Nothing like making your own news, I guess. I’m annoyed by their repeated attempts to give me a free subscription; I’d rather subscribe to the paper of their wholly-owned subsidiary, Weekly World News.

I remember the days (so long ago, it seems) when computer magazines were informational, well-balanced, and all about having fun or being productive with your computer. Now we have a lot of primadonna hacks looking for recognition from their editiorials. Usually, the review comes down to “this sucks” or “you sure could use those extra clock cycles for your SETI@Home screensaver”. In a word: drivel.

Am I bitter? Well, maybe. I just remember the days when everyone was a computer *hobbyist*, and the journalism was more respectable. Instead of schematics, though, now we have articles about how pretty and sleek titlebars are in WindowsXP.
🙂

]]>
By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/the-pundits-are-wrong-about-apples-defection-2/#comment-1793 Fri, 09 Aug 2002 16:38:08 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=1078#comment-1793 IBM lays desktop PowerPC on Cupertino lawn.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/the-pundits-are-wrong-about-apples-defection-2/#comment-1792 Fri, 09 Aug 2002 13:53:19 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=1078#comment-1792 Apple had a copy of MacOS ready for IBM computers in the late 80’s. The code name was “StarTrek” . When they were starting to get pressure from others, they talked with IBM about possibly using MacOS on a IBM computer. Apple and IBM techs got together and gave a demo of MacOS 7 running on a PS/2. Then for some reason or another Apple killed the project and IBM went to work on OS/2 with Microsoft.

There was also project PINK that hoped to put MacOS on IBM.

There’s a book called “Apple Confidential” out there that tells the story better than I can.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/the-pundits-are-wrong-about-apples-defection-2/#comment-1791 Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:18:12 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=1078#comment-1791 Apple’s next CPU is likely based on IBM’s power4 chip, kind of a beefed-up, steroid-enhanced PowerPC. See news.com’s story here: http://news.com.com/2100-1001-949030.html?tag=fd_top

This would give the GHz boost needed, and give another out to those of us who dislike MS, but need photoshop.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/the-pundits-are-wrong-about-apples-defection-2/#comment-1798 Fri, 09 Aug 2002 09:00:29 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=1078#comment-1798 Good call. It seems that as all things IT related slow down to a crawl, these mags become desperate since there isn’t much to write about. Instead of just accepting it they turn to tabloid writing. I have seen so many garbage reports these days that I can’t even be bothered to check up on the news anymore. I read The Inquirer every once in a while, if not only to get a laugh or two along with the rumors they write about 🙂

/Dave T.

]]>