Comments on: Randomness for Sunday https://dfarq.homeip.net/randomness-for-sunday/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=randomness-for-sunday David L. Farquhar on technology old and new, computer security, and more Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:05:44 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/randomness-for-sunday/#comment-4052 Mon, 07 May 2001 03:16:02 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=773#comment-4052 I used Fusion MX to design the template for the Greymatter site. That wasn’t difficult at all – I was in a time crunch, so I simply opened up a new site and copied the HTML source into the Greymatter template, fixed a couple of links, and there we are. I think it works nicely.

I just got tired of messing around with FrontPage every night and especially rolling pages around every week, updating old indices, having it publish every page on the site, etc. Although a lot of things are easy in FrontPage, you were completely correct in saying that maintaining this sort of site is not one of its strong suits.

I’ll send Noah a title too in a couple of weeks. He seems to have worked himself into a frezy producing this product from what I can tell. He did a fabulous job, though.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/randomness-for-sunday/#comment-4054 Sun, 06 May 2001 20:24:59 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=773#comment-4054 Initially I used NetObjects Fusion, which I think is much better than FrontPage. The scrollwheel on your mouse doesn’t work with it (or at least not with 5.0, which was what I used) and it’s not as multithreaded as FrontPage, but to me, those are minor details–the program works. It doesn’t lose your pages or decide on a whim to reupload everything you ever typed on it. Reliability is more important to me than grace and style.

But it’s not ideal for this type of site. It’s the wrong kind of tool. For a Daynotes/Weblogs site, you just want to shoot in some text, have the computer worry about fitting it into the template and creating the new files and linking the new files to the old ones, and if you can give the users some interactivity, that makes it even better. Manila does a pretty good job, but Greymatter’s free (I’ll send Noah Grey a book or two off his wishlist if I’m still using this in a month or so) and runs on free operating systems. But since it’s written in Perl, you can throw as much hardware at the problem as you want. If a Greymatter site needs AS/400 power for some insane reason, you can do that. An NT-based solution like Manila doesn’t have that kind of versatility.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/randomness-for-sunday/#comment-4053 Sun, 06 May 2001 14:26:13 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=773#comment-4053 Thanks for the mention, Dave. It is saving me lots of time and it’s so easy – I just write and publish in three clicks. Now that’s cool. I’m really pleased with Greymatter and I’ve got you to thank for the introduction to it.

Microsoft’s products of late really make my stomach turn. It’s disconcerting (to say the least) to watch as 29 pages of freshly written material disappear and the nice "We’re sorry" error pops up on the screen. How polite of them.
By the next week I should have a lot more infrastructure in place to get rid of Microsoft’s unpredictability.

Thanks again for the mention.

]]>