Comments on: News vs propaganda https://dfarq.homeip.net/news-vs-propaganda/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=news-vs-propaganda David L. Farquhar on technology old and new, computer security, and more Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:32:33 +0000 hourly 1 By: Shirley Dulcey https://dfarq.homeip.net/news-vs-propaganda/#comment-53584 Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:06:15 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=22061#comment-53584 The three source rule is not hard and fast. A story could be news with one source if that source is primary, like something that a public figure says on national television or in an interview published by a major newspaper or magazine. But it could also be propaganda, depending on how you use those words.

As for the politician who won an election with a 98% margin and is down in the 60s in current polls, the first obvious question is “who was the opponent?” Here in Massachusetts we sometimes have elections where the Republican Party doesn’t bother to field a candidate. (Massachusetts is a blue state where Republicans rarely win statewide offices other than Governor… and the Republicans who win that office sometimes aren’t the sort that get elected in the other states. For a prime example, look at what happened to Bill Weld and his national aspirations.) That might leave somebody in an election with no opponent at all, or with only a fringe independent candidate on the ballot, a situation that leads to very large margins of victory. But in the current election they might be facing a real opponent, and people who voted for the incumbent last time because of a lack of a viable alternative may support that opponent.

]]>