Comments on: Make sure you use this link before it gets sued off the web https://dfarq.homeip.net/make-sure-you-use-this-link-before-it-gets-sued-off-the-web/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=make-sure-you-use-this-link-before-it-gets-sued-off-the-web David L. Farquhar on technology old and new, computer security, and more Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:05:42 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/make-sure-you-use-this-link-before-it-gets-sued-off-the-web/#comment-5550 Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:07:54 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=1501#comment-5550 In reply to Anonymous.

Sort of. The difference is Gutenberg is entirely public domain texts, where Google is providing restricted access to copyrighted work.

I suppose they make money off it by placing highly targeted ads and/or through an affiliate agreement. When you bring up a text, there are links to buy it on the left-hand side.

Google has always been pretty secretive about how they make money, but obviously they’re doing OK.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/make-sure-you-use-this-link-before-it-gets-sued-off-the-web/#comment-5549 Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:49:23 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=1501#comment-5549 Is this google’s counterpart to the Gutenberg project? I suppose they found a way to make money off it like their search engine.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/make-sure-you-use-this-link-before-it-gets-sued-off-the-web/#comment-5533 Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:50:41 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=1501#comment-5533 In reply to Anonymous.

I noticed today when I was playing with it that basically any time I read more than about three pages it made me enter a phrase that it displayed graphically. It used viruses and spyware as an excuse. That’ll defeat a lot of those types of programs by verifying it is a human reading it. I also noticed it seemed to be leaving pages out at random.

And I wonder if the legal challenges had something to do with Google issuing that stock to raise $6 billion or whatever it was recently? That gives them a nice war chest. As long as Fair Use isn’t declared unconstitutional I think Google has a case.

I’m sure all of the powers that be who believe big business is infallible are going to agonize mightily over this one. What we have now is a showdown between old big business and new big business. And I think the only companies who stand a chance of winning a fundamental copyright war these days are Google or Microsoft. And of course Microsoft isn’t gonna fight it–the more onerous copyright law becomes, the more money they stand to make. That leaves Google.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://dfarq.homeip.net/make-sure-you-use-this-link-before-it-gets-sued-off-the-web/#comment-5532 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:59:33 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=1501#comment-5532 Google is proceeding very cautiously, and my understanding is that they’re only digitizing books that the publishers consent to. It’s been some time since I looked into it, so things might’ve changed, but Google is ahead of the game when it comes to anticipating fallout.

The problem they’ll have is those with nefarious purposes in mind. Google Print allows you to print pages of a book, up to .. ten, I think, from each book. However, there’s already software floating about that basically annihilates Google’s method of tracking your page count, and allows you to print an entire book straight to PDF.

That could be problematic.

(First response is – do tracking server side by IP address. Unfortunately, many large companies and schools use a single proxy server for their outside access. Of course would all the same people be looking at the same book? grumble. That’s why I don’t work at Google. :))

]]>