Comments on: IBM ends sales of OS/2, December 16, 2005 https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005 David L. Farquhar on technology old and new, computer security, and more Fri, 26 Dec 2025 00:40:42 +0000 hourly 1 By: neo https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/#comment-57403 Fri, 26 Dec 2025 00:40:42 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=36443#comment-57403 In reply to Dave Farquhar.

thanks

what is the most powerful ps/2 or ibm aptiva and cpu that supports the latest version of os/2 out of the box with included drivers for vintage pc?

]]>
By: Dave Farquhar https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/#comment-57401 Thu, 25 Dec 2025 16:22:48 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=36443#comment-57401 In reply to neo.

Last paragraph of the blog post covers modern OS/2. As for OS/2 drivers, I was always able to find drivers for all but the cheapest graphics cards, including 3D accelerators. Cheap sound cards, cheap network cards, and Winmodems could be problematic but those types of devices gave you trouble in Windows too.

]]>
By: neo https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/#comment-57395 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 16:15:36 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=36443#comment-57395 In reply to James.

BeOs has awesome demo

]]>
By: James https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/#comment-57394 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 05:19:07 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=36443#comment-57394 As a teenager in the 90s I’d heard of OS/2 but my primary interest in computers was games and BBS’s and for those uses MS-DOS was king, at least in the IBM compatible world. We had Windows 3.1 on the family PC which was used for MS Works, Encarta and a couple other things that needed it but that was only started up when needed. OS/2 was at the time for me a solution in search of a problem. I think it had a lot of potential though and had it caught on and gotten an equivalent to DirectX OS/2 could have been a great operating system.

]]>
By: neo https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/#comment-57393 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 03:14:57 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=36443#comment-57393 In reply to garyohuk.

i’ve seen posts on forums on ibm os/2 complaining that they couldn’t find drivers or os/2 wouldn’t install on their pc.

i suppose i might add i’d like to have graphics and especially GUI accelerators supported. in the 90s there were 2d GUI accelerators like diamond viper whose sold purpose was to accelerate windows 3.1 redraw

are there any modern pc build that succeeds os/2

]]>
By: garyohuk https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/#comment-57392 Wed, 17 Dec 2025 12:16:53 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=36443#comment-57392 In reply to neo.

Most good quality AT standard clones, like Compaq, Zenith, etc, and of course IBM’s own ATs

]]>
By: neo https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/#comment-57391 Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:44:52 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=36443#comment-57391 what pc hardware could run os/2 out of the box

]]>
By: garyohuk https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/#comment-57390 Tue, 16 Dec 2025 12:50:48 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=36443#comment-57390 In reply to ibmmuseum.

I remember the guys from Microsoft turning up before “OS/2” giving us the skinny on “Advanced286Dos” because that’s what it was called (designed in the days when the 286 still held sway). The tricks the os had to perform to swap from one VM to another meant it was always going to be suboptimal on that, and then the 386 appeared.
When it was in full swing and we were implementing OS/2 drivers we all hoovered up Gordon Letwins book Inside OS/2, which I still have. It was a fine operating system but in and amongst the ubiquity of DOS, Xenix and the other Unix lookalikes, and the fact that ultimately Microsoft dumped it in favour of the next Windows it withered away. The other issue was that it’s networking system – Lan Manager – was not as fast as Novell, and as interconnectivity was starting to be a major thing that’s was no good.

]]>
By: Tim https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/#comment-56696 Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:52:29 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=36443#comment-56696 I remember installing OS/2 for fun on decommissioned office IBM IntelliStation E Pro workstation in the early 2010s, all device drivers were found using simple MT-M search on support.ibm.com. Became an overnight sensation among my colleagues.

]]>
By: Dave Farquhar https://dfarq.homeip.net/ibm-ends-sales-of-os-2-december-16-2005/#comment-56694 Wed, 18 Dec 2024 22:41:30 +0000 https://dfarq.homeip.net/?p=36443#comment-56694 In reply to neo.

Neither OS/2 nor BeOS had much native software available but OS/2 could run DOS and Windows apps. I liked them both but OS/2 was more practical to use.

]]>