The Silicon Underground
  Welcome to Dave Farquhar's Silicon Underground Monday, November 23 2009 @ 12:06 PM CST  
Theme Changer
Change the look of the site by selecting a theme below:

What's New
STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
  • Why don't wins co...

  • LINKS last 2 wks
    No recent new links

    Google Ads

    User Functions
    Username:

    Password:

    Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

    Firefox


    So there is a benefit to running Windows Server 2003 and XP   
    Wednesday, November 10 2004 @ 05:57 PM CST
    By David L. Farquhar

    One of the reasons Windows Server 2003 and XP haven't caught on in corporate network environments is that Microsoft has yet to demonstrate any real benefit to either one of them over Windows 2000.

    Believe it or not, there actually is one benefit. It may or may not be worth the cost of upgrading, but if you're buying licenses now and installing 2000, this information might convince you it's worth it to install the current versions instead.

    The benefit: NTFS compression.

    Hang on there Dave, I hear you saying. NTFS compression has been around since 1994, and hard drives are bigger and cheaper now than ever before. So why do I want to mess around with risky data compression?

    Well, data compression isn't fundamentally risky--this site uses data compression, and I've got the server logs that prove it works just fine--it just got a bad rap in the early 90s when Microsoft released the disastrous Doublespace with DOS 6.0. And when your I/O bus is slow and your CPU is really fast, data compression actually speeds things up, as people who installed DR DOS on their 386DX-40s with a pokey 8 MHz ISA bus found out in 1991.

    So, here's the rub with NTFS compression when it's used on Windows Server 2003 with XP clients: the data is transferred from the server to the clients in compressed form.

    If budget cuts still have you saddled with a 100 Mb or, worse yet, a 10 Mb network, that data compression will speed things up mightily. It won't help you move jpegs around your network any faster, but Word and Excel documents sure will zoom around a lot quicker, because those types of documents pack down mightily.

    The faster the computers are on both ends, the better this works. But if the server has one or more multi-GHz CPUs, you won't slow down disk writes a lot. And you can use this strategically. Don't compress the shares belonging to your graphic artists and web developers, for instance. Their stuff tends not to compress, and if any of them are using Macintoshes, the server will have to decompress it to send it to the Macs anyway.

    But for shares that are primarily made up of files created by MS Office, compress away and enjoy your newfound network speed.

      [ Views: 1308 ]  


    So there is a benefit to running Windows Server 2003 and XP | 3 comments | Create New Account
    The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
    More re compression gains
    Authored by: bo on Wednesday, November 10 2004 @ 06:12 PM CST
    MS-Word files are shamelessly bloated, so even the relatively simple ntfs compression works wonders.

    One gains more than expected in web/email transfers since doc binary files are typically 2-to-3 encoded to ASCII-compatible, with consequent 33% increase in byte overhead. A third more of a much smaller file is less punishing than of the larger one.

    We might note in passing that the OpenOffice/StarOffice apps produce natively compressed document files (each actually a clusterlet of XML ones). Nothing to gain there.

    [ Reply to This ]

    So there is a benefit to running Windows Server 2003 and XP
    Authored by: csebold on Thursday, November 11 2004 @ 08:23 AM CST
    Of course, one should point out that compression is only worthwhile if you have good backups that work. If you are relying on some kind of recovery tool to help you recover a compressed filesystem that has been b0rked you may be sorely disappointed.

    (Having just spent way more time than I should have this weekend attempting to recover some data from a compressed FAT32 partition for a relative, and I know that's different from NTFS compression, I am perhaps a little jumpy about this sort of thing.)

    [ Reply to This ]

    What's Related
  • More by DaveF
  • More from Servers and Networking

  • Story Options
  • Mail Story to a Friend
  • Printable Story Format


  • Calendar
    November 2009
    SuMoTuWeThFrSa
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28
    29
    30
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    Click on any day to see postings and events for that date.

    Referrals

    Top 10 by Comments
    Story TitleComments
    Cheap laptops from Sotec 253
    An untrustworthy vendor 164
    Upgrading an eMachine 125
    eMachine upgrade advice 99
    Why I dislike Microsoft 51
    Upgrade diary: Gateway G6-400 35
    And we're live 30
    The day after the Columbia 22
    How to pray 22
    CD-ROM troubleshooting under Windows 9x 20

    Top 10 Read
    Story TitleViews
    eMachine upgrade advice 74334
    Upgrading an eMachine 63083
    How to view a blg file in Windows 2000 50612
    Cheap laptops from Sotec 32796
    Upgrade diary: Compaq Presario 7360 19997
    Upgrade diary: Gateway G6-400 19874
    CD-ROM troubleshooting under Windows 9x 15549
    Finding an open-source alternative to Ghost 14292
    Big trouble 13815
    Salary cap? Baseball needs something 11798

    Topics
    Home
    Apache (2)
    Baseball (63)
    Book reviews (2)
    Business (1)
    Christianity (57)
    Cooking (1)
    Copyright (16)
    Curmudgeonry (1)
    Design (7)
    DOS (6)
    Games (4)
    Genealogy (11)
    General (507)
    Hardware (168)
    Health (13)
    Human Interest (9)
    Humor/Satire (19)
    Investing (4)
    Journalism (1)
    Linux (93)
    Macintosh (22)
    Model Building (3)
    Music (33)
    net.culture (40)
    Personal (88)
    Photography (6)
    Politics (3)
    Retro Computing (26)
    Saving money (72)
    Servers and Networking (18)
    Society (49)
    Software (55)
    Spam (13)
    St. Louis (23)
    This weblog (14)
    Toy trains (74)
    Troubleshooting (7)
    Useless Trivia (1)
    Vendors (6)
    Video (21)
    Viruses (12)
    Windows (120)
    Writing (16)

    Older Stories
    Wednesday 30-Sep
  • 401(K) Paperwork (0)

  • Sunday 27-Sep
  • First impressions: HP Mini 110 (1)

  • Saturday 26-Sep
  • Getting more screen real estate in Firefox (0)

  • Wednesday 23-Sep
  • Barfy. (4)

  • Monday 21-Sep
  • Why I quit my job (2)

  • Saturday 12-Sep
  • Slimming down Windows XP for SSDs and nettops (0)

  • Thursday 10-Sep
  • And... bailing out. (3)

  • Friday 04-Sep
  • End of the innocence (0)

  • Monday 31-Aug
  • Installing Windows off USB (1)

  • Friday 21-Aug
  • Diving into real estate (0)

  • Who's Online
    Guest Users: 8

    Syndicate!
    Get your RSS/RDF fix here.

    List of all stories
    Click here for a list of all the entries on this site


    Created this page in 0.91 seconds


     Copyright © 2009 Dave Farquhar's Silicon Underground
     All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.

    Powered by GL 1.3.x